← Back to Blog

When Control Needs Breathing Room

Dandelion seeds lifting into a clear blue sky, carried by the wind

I recently started reading the book Breath by James Nestor after looking for something that explored a topic I’m already familiar with, but curious about in terms of current research. What stood out early on was not just the content itself, but the way it reframed something as ordinary and automatic as breathing into something worth examining more closely.

The book moves through historical perspectives, emerging research, and the author’s own experiences, all centered on a deceptively simple question: are we breathing in a way that actually supports our wellbeing? It touches on how people breathe and its impact on teeth, sleep, physical performance, and stress regulation, suggesting that even the most automatic processes in the body may have layers we don’t fully notice.

There’s a particular pull to ideas like this. They highlight something we do every day and offer the possibility that, with small adjustments, we might feel or function better. More than that, they offer a sense of control. In a world where many circumstances feel unpredictable or outside of our influence, being able to point to something internal—something as constant as breath—and think, this is something I can work with, can feel grounding.

That desire for control doesn’t just show up in how we think about breathing. It shows up across many areas of health and wellness. With the amount of information available, it’s easy to find clear, confident recommendations about what we should be doing: how to eat, when to exercise, how to recover, and which beauty serum will make us wake up looking 10 years younger (though in reality, it’s likely none of them, and quality sleep is far more likely to have that effect). These recommendations often promise a kind of stability: follow this approach, and you’ll be doing it “right.”

I noticed this recently when I came across a video from a fitness influencer discussing protein timing. In it, they suggested that total protein intake over the course of a day is just as important, if not more so, than having protein immediately after a workout. It caught my attention because it challenged a long-standing belief that post-workout protein is essential.

What stood out, though, wasn’t just the claim itself, but how quickly it offered a new sense of structure. One clear idea replacing another. A different, more relaxed, way to “get it right.”

When I looked further into the research, including a recent 2025 meta-analysis, the picture became a bit less definitive. For individuals who are generally healthy and physically active, consuming protein either before or after a workout appears to make minimal to no meaningful difference. The authors also noted that more research is needed to determine whether there are any statistically significant differences related to upper versus lower body training and protein timing. Overall, protein timing in this context may not be as critical as it is often made out to be—and it didn’t fully support the influencer’s claim about a broad 24-hour window either.

Rather than landing on a new, more easily digestible rule, what emerged from searching this topic was something less concrete. And while that lack of certainty might feel less satisfying, it also points to something important: not everything needs to be tightly controlled to be effective.

There can be a tendency to search for the optimal approach—the best timing, the best method, the most efficient path. And while optimization has its place, it can also narrow our focus, making it feel as though small details carry more weight than they actually do. In doing so, we may overlook the broader patterns that matter just as much, if not more.

Returning to Breath, it sits within this same space. It invites attention to something fundamental while raising a quieter question about how we relate to that attention. Is the goal to perfect something as automatic as breathing, or to become more aware of it? Is it about control, or about simply noticing what is already happening and how we might choose to respond to it?

In many ways, the answer may not be one or the other. Wanting a sense of control is a natural response, especially in environments that feel uncertain or demanding. But control does not always have to mean precision. Sometimes, it can look like consistency, awareness, or the ability to adapt rather than rigidly follow a rule.

This is where a different kind of balance can begin to take shape—not between right and wrong, or even between true and false, but between effort and ease, between doing something well and needing to do it perfectly.

In that space, control becomes less about getting everything exactly right, and more about how we choose to respond to what is already within our reach.

One way to explore this idea more intentionally is through reflection:

Like breathing itself, many of the processes that support us are already in motion. Paying attention to them can be useful. Trying to perfect them entirely may be less so. And somewhere in between those two approaches is often where a more sustainable and healthy sense of control begins to emerge.

In my work supporting clients who are looking to better understand their relationship with control, or to develop a healthier, more flexible way of relating to it, this often becomes a central focus: noticing where control feels supportive, where it becomes rigid, and how to create more room for choice rather than automatic striving.

Over time, this shift is often less like a breakthrough revelation and more like a breath of fresh air.

Related reading: Between Light and Darkness

Ready to work on this?

If you’re looking to understand your relationship with control—where it feels supportive and where it becomes rigid—therapy can help. Amber works with adults and adolescents in McLean, Virginia and via telehealth.

Get in touch